Experimental Product: The First Step

What we are going to build as a first step & experiment to test how people respond to different models of scholarly communication? The ‘decision’ based on the comparison matrix for our works-in-progress server:

  • Commentpress style-layout
  • Stackoverflow Style Commentary & Scoring System
  • Authoring Environment
  • Possibly find reviewing features from annotum as well
  • Exploit the XML model from annotum to have semi-structured publications
  • Hopefully connect this to handles with an eye towards DOIs

Lots still open for the future from our grand vision, but this is an excellent first step
We need to establish a timeline now…

Off-the-shelf solutions for open pub/review

Utopia Documents + PDF Upload = Preprints with Commentary

Utopia Docs is a desktop app (PDF reader) + web service that allows users to annotate PDFs in a localized (anchored), conversational format. Annotations are universally visible: if another user opens the same PDF, they’ll see other users’ annotations.

http://getutopia.com/

Stack Overflow

Upvoting/downvoting of questions/answers/comments, credit accumulation, new capabilities as credit is accumulated (e.g., can only upvote comments after some number of points have been gained).

Mismatch between length of questions & the long-form articles we want to be able to handle.

http://stackoverflow.com/

Commentpress

Fine-grained commenting theme for WordPress, so that conversations can happen on paragraphs. Big advantage over Utopia: in the browser; in WordPress and therefore more hackable.

http://www.futureofthebook.org/commentpress/

Annotum

WordPress theme for “journal” publication/review used for PLoS Currents

http://annotum.org/

http://currents.plos.org/

PLoS Hubs

“Portal” platform, currently only one example.

http://hubs.plos.org

Thoughts/mashups

  • Pull Utopia Docs/other annotations could into a Stack Overflow or other-like service via an API?
  • WordPress-based solution using Annotum/CommentPress/ratings plugin, etc., etc.
  • Some other content management system/framework (Drupal etc.)

Collaboration readiness

Hi,

Thanks for allowing me to sit on this morning – cool stuff.

Here are those refs to work on collaboration readiness:

Olson, G. M. & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2/3), 139-178.

Olson, G.M., Teasley, S., Bietz, M. J., & Cogburn, D. L. (2002). Collaboratories to support distributed science: the example of international HIV/AIDS research, Proceedings of the 2002 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information

Easy,

JP

Survey We Will Conduct

Issues Addressed by Survey

  • Gaps in publishing – desirables, impediments, and what I hate about the current process
  • Metrics of reputation from scholarly publishing
  • Incentives to try something new

This survey will address the ‘readyness’ of the community for a publishing 2.0 solution, and what will help guide people forward as quickly as possible

Survey #2 will be a post-‘experiment’ survey